9.30.2010

My kid just turned 13 months yesterday so I'm thinking it's a tad premature to be worried about this issue but I'm already starting to stress about the thought of sending her to school.


I'm not worried that the curriculum and public system will fail her (it will, but likely not enough to bother me). I'm not worried she have to deal with bad teachers and mean kids (she will, I did, it sucks but I don't think it can be avoided). I'm not worried about her safety in the classroom or on the playground (we live in a safe city in a safe country and pathetically people are way too freaked-out about American law suits to let kids play "dangerously" anymore anyway). I'm not worried she won't make friends or have a good time or learn some useful stuff.

I'm worried about what to pack her for lunch.

My friend's daughter started junior kindergarten this year and they sent home a disturbingly long list of items that are BANNED from the classroom. As in, send your child with any of these items and we will take them away, throw them out in a biohazardous bin and your child will go hungry. All to keep the other kid(s?) safe from LIFE THREATENING allergies. The list includes the obvious total nut ban but also: anything with whole wheat/gluten, anything with eggs and anything with dairy. They also provided a helpful (?) list of recommended items such as very expensive rice crackers and other gluten-free items.

My friend is a single low-income mother who's picky eater lives on eggs, cheese and Cheerios. So she's SOL on the snack front.

Now, lest it seem I'm unsympathetic to children with allergies, I was the loser weezy kid with all the allergies (dairy, cats, dust, fish, etc.) who had to bring her own dessert (Twinkies - nothing harmful there because it contains no actual food) to birthday parties. I also have a serious full-anaphylaxis to salmon. I've never needed it but I carry an adrenaline kit with me everywhere just in case. But here's the thing: none of this stuff will kill me if someone else is eating it. I understand that the peanut/nut thing can actually (though very rarely) cause serious issues based solely on proximity but when the hell did these other allergens go airborne? Is anaphylaxis to wheat that common these days?

So far my kid seems to have dodged the allergen issue (knock wood) but I can't believe that even if she had a problem I would try to have it banned from the entire school. I would definitely make sure she knew that she was not supposed to eat other kids food and tell the teacher if I was really worried but hell, if my kid is allergic to cats should I make all the kids with cats take showers and wash their clothes before entering the building?

Make no mistake, I'm a control-freak so I understand the impulse to try to protect your child from harm using every means possible but what the hell do these people think their kids are going to do on field trips, when they go to high school, in a mall food court, etc. But maybe I'm blaming the wrong people. Maybe the lawsuit-paranoid schools are to blame. It just kills me that risk-adverse decisions like this one, made with no evidence or logic to support them, will likely do more harm to the kids whose parents can't afford the time or money to be able to find nutritious food that fits the rules (and that their kids will actually eat). I'm willing to bet Twinkies haven't been banned.

7 comments:

  1. I know...it's a mess but I've NEVER heard of an indirect (for lack of a better word...passive?) wheat allergy. Sounds similar to the note we got home from my stepson's kindergarten class, "A student in the class is allergic to ranch dressing and spaghetti sauce."

    Honest to God.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ranch dressing and spaghetti sauce?! I love it. That's definitely an example of parent control-freakiness... and ignorance. I think it bothers me mainly because the likely "cry-wolf" effect where kids with genuine allergies have the potential of getting lost amongst all the ranch dressing kids.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like your balanced post, and it is especially nice to read it from someone who had dealt with allergies personally. My daughter is allergic to peanuts and carries an epi-pen. Of course I worry and am cautious and careful about her allergy, but I do not panic. I am fairly happy with the way her school has handled the food allergies. In the younger grades they would eat in their classroom, and if someone brought in something with nuts, they were allowed to eat it, but in a different room. Those kids soon stopped bringing in peanut butter. Now in the slightly older grades, they all eat together in a lunch room. My daughter eats at the 'allergy table', which sounds worse than it is. At the allergy table there are no nuts, no sesame, no fish. The other kids at other tables can bring those items (maybe not the nuts but I'm not completely sure), but at least my daughter is at a safe table. She can also choose to bring a friend of her choosing to eat with her at the allergy table if she wants. I worried at first that this practice ostracized the kids with allergies, but she is happy, so I don't worry about it. And it makes life easier for everyone else too.

    Your school sounds extreme, and I think it is going too far. They have made an already mundane and frustrating task even harder.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I do much prefer the idea of an allergy table than a full-on ban. I'm glad your daughter doesn't seem to mind either - it sucks bad enough to not be able to eat everything other kids eat. My friend's kid's school is the worst I've heard so far for food but I've heard other local risk-adverse school horror stories. Like the school in town where kids aren't allowed at all on the play structures after October lest their hands (or tongues) freeze to the metal stuff. We're not sure where we're sending our daughter yet but there seems to be so much insanity these days it does worry me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Our school bans the kids from the playstructure afer the ground has frozen in case they fall off - it would be a much harder landing than onto soft sand. I believe it is part of the school's insurance policy too, though I'm not 100% sure about that part. But I always let them play on it after the bell rang, especially if there was soft snow on the ground.

    There is an awful lot of caution around these days, isn't there...

    ReplyDelete
  6. When my son turned 13 months my biggest fear that he was going to knock-off a liquor store one day or become a corporate lawyer. I think your friend's school's allergy rules are the most excessive I've ever heard! In any case, what Finola forgot to mention was that the invitation to eat at the 'allergy table' is one of the most coveted social engagements going. I can't tell you how many times my daughter has come home thrilled that she got to eat at the 'allergy table' with a good friend.

    Oh and - another benefit to the Twinkies is that when they get smushed at the bottom of the backpack and are forgotten about for six weeks, they at least don't start to stink. A smushed banana in the bottom of the backpack is a totally different story.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm really all for reasonable informed caution. I really don't believe that in the good old days things were better: kids just got killed/maimed more frequently so people were more jaded. However, things have definitely gotten way out of control when we're dealing with insane rates of obesity and kids can't burn energy/calories just playing anymore. And I guess one good thing from the "normalization" of allergies is that from what you guys say it's not a source of ostracism anymore. I always hated having to explain again and again why I couldn't eat ice cream and detested the feeling of being pitied.

    ReplyDelete